SIMPLIFYING LEGAL LANGUAGE WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Keywords:
legal terminology, plain language movement, generative artificial intelligence, legal language, terminological workAbstract
This study presents an excerpt from a doctoral thesis in Information Science and addresses the employment of generative artificial intelligence as an auxiliary resource in terminological work. The objective was to verify whether generative artificial intelligence resources can support researchers in rewriting legal terms and definitions using the principles of the Plain Language Movement. The qualitative, empirical, and exploratory methodology involved prior conceptual modeling and empirical testing with specific prompts to evaluate the consistency of the machines' suggestions. The results demonstrated that the technology offers positive contributions, such as suggesting more user-friendly terms and assisting in the elimination of textual ambiguities. However, the research identified significant semantic flaws, including the use of technically incorrect synonyms for the context of use within the legal domain, and the production of texts with informal or infantilized language. It is concluded that terminological work is an essentially cognitive and human activity. Although artificial intelligence is useful in a subsidiary capacity, expert mediation is indispensable to ensure that language simplification does not compromise the conceptual rigor of Law.